![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqsCHj5ZgCgU2fCCcHwRpemEVF3x5ZsB-SGuGEAwd4xbeuSiz4sd0S0ZRrogWDu8y6YbASweeri8DlRKgWWqhb_MTxR6NIKYX8fLIaSgsz2g3mkFxsnqr9uIMWtzFrnN5oZMbd_j6S7ifg/s320/Tupperware.jpg)
There is an interesting article in the Whitman Quarterly Review by Matt Cohen entitled “Martin Tupper, Walt Whitman, and the Early Reviews of Leaves of Grass.” While Whitman was aware of Tupper and probably had read some of his writings, he had not met Tupper which, as Cohen states, is not surprising given their complete opposite personal backgrounds. The most interesting aspect of the article is Cohen’s assertion that Whitman may have used Tupper’s work as the basis for the free form verse he utilizes in Leaves of Grass. So why would Whitman have used the poetic form of someone who was the living antithesis to the themes of his own poetry? This is a question that is probably impossible to answer with certainty, but it certainly reinforces the notion that Whitman was not afraid to cherry pick techniques and themes, even from people or institutions that he was fundamentally opposed to. Whitman was an aggregator of sorts, and there was no place that was off limits for his treasure hunt.
Excellent detective work!
ReplyDelete